forked/libnfc
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/nfc-tools/libnfc.git synced 2026-07-24 12:41:54 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix unit tests

Browse Source 
This commit bring tests to life!

New issue
Summary: test_dep_states test fails
When first device is idle, the second one states  "RF Transmission Error" instead of simply not found any available device.
Full cutter log here:

debug   libnfc.chip.pn53x       InJumpForDEP
debug   libnfc.chip.pn53x       Timeout values: 300
debug   libnfc.bus.uart TX: 00  00  ff  05  fb  d4  56  00  00  00  d6  00
debug   libnfc.bus.uart RX: 00  00  ff  00  ff  00
debug   libnfc.chip.pn53x       PN53x ACKed
debug   libnfc.bus.uart Timeout!
debug   libnfc.chip.pn53x       InJumpForDEP
debug   libnfc.chip.pn53x       Timeout values: 300
debug   libnfc.bus.uart TX: 00  00  ff  05  fb  d4  56  00  00  00  d6  00
debug   libnfc.bus.uart RX: 00  00  ff  00  ff  00
debug   libnfc.chip.pn53x       PN53x ACKed
debug   libnfc.bus.uart RX: 00  00  ff  03  fd
debug   libnfc.bus.uart RX: d5  57
debug   libnfc.bus.uart RX: 01
debug   libnfc.bus.uart RX: d3  00
debug   libnfc.chip.pn53x       Chip error: "Timeout" (01), returned error: "RF Transmission Error" (-20))
F
===============================================================================
Failure: test_dep_states
Problem with nfc_idle
<0 == res>
expected: <0>
  actual: <-20>

diff:
? -20

./test_device_modes_as_dep.c:171: initiator_thread(): cut_assert_equal_int(0, res, cut_test_context_set_current_result_user_message( cut_test_context_current_peek(), cut_test_context_take_printf(cut_test_context_current_peek(), "Problem with nfc_idle")))
===============================================================================
This commit is contained in:
Romuald Conty
2013-01-18 18:28:45 +01:00
parent 443f70dd65
commit 2d53208082
8 changed files with 87 additions and 76 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
test/test_access_storm.c
View File

@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
* This is basically a stress-test to ensure we don't left a device in an
* inconsistent state after use.
*/
void test_access_storm(void);
void
test_access_storm(void)
{
@@ -17,23 +19,22 @@ test_access_storm(void)
nfc_connstring connstrings[MAX_DEVICE_COUNT];
int res = 0;
nfc_init(NULL);
nfc_context *context;
nfc_init(&context);
size_t ref_device_count = nfc_list_devices(NULL, connstrings, MAX_DEVICE_COUNT);
size_t ref_device_count = nfc_list_devices(context, connstrings, MAX_DEVICE_COUNT);
if (!ref_device_count)
cut_omit("No NFC device found");
while (n) {
size_t i;
size_t device_count = nfc_list_devices(NULL, connstrings, MAX_DEVICE_COUNT);
size_t device_count = nfc_list_devices(context, connstrings, MAX_DEVICE_COUNT);
cut_assert_equal_int(ref_device_count, device_count, cut_message("device count"));
for (i = 0; i < device_count; i++) {
for (size_t i = 0; i < device_count; i++) {
nfc_device *device;
nfc_target ant[MAX_TARGET_COUNT];
device = nfc_open(NULL, connstrings[i]);
device = nfc_open(context, connstrings[i]);
cut_assert_not_null(device, cut_message("nfc_open"));
res = nfc_initiator_init(device);
@@ -51,5 +52,5 @@ test_access_storm(void)
n--;
}
nfc_exit(NULL);
nfc_exit(context);
}